Official China Court Cases

Foreign-Related China Court Case Library

English notes on official Chinese court cases involving foreign-related commercial litigation, arbitration support, maritime disputes, judgment or award enforcement, international trade, and China-side asset recovery. This library helps foreign companies see how Chinese courts approach real cross-border disputes before choosing a filing or enforcement strategy.

Why this library matters

Real cases show what a China-side strategy needs to prove.

We read official court releases with a foreign claimant's question in mind: what evidence mattered, which forum or enforcement route was used, and what practical step should be prepared before a dispute reaches court. If your dispute has a China connection, SueInChina can review jurisdiction, evidence, preservation options, and recoverability before you file.

Ask for a China-side case review
What we are watching

Selected named public court case

Only notes matched to an individually identifiable case are shown here. Collection-level links and repeated research notes are not counted as separate court cases. Updated 2 October 2026.

Official source · 2015

China International Commercial Court, first batch of Belt and Road construction typical cases

A named public court case from this official collection. This is not a SueInChina team matter; the note is general information, not legal advice.

Foreign judgment recognition BRI-2015-08

Frigopol: recognition of a Polish judgment in Ningbo (2014)

Issue. A Polish company sought recognition of a final Polish judgment in Ningbo.

Court handling. The published account records recognition under the China–Poland judicial-assistance treaty.

Practical takeaway. This is case 8 of the named official collection. Its historical outcome does not establish recognition or recovery in another case.

Source: China International Commercial Court, first batch of Belt and Road construction typical cases

Further official source collections

These links are reference collections, not a count of individually verified cases or our team’s matters. Earlier working notes are retained for editorial checking before individual publication.

General information only. These case notes summarize official public materials and do not replace case-specific legal advice. Outcomes depend on the facts, documents, court, applicable law, limitation period, service, assets, and procedural route.
Contact us
Send a case inquiryTell us about your matter Chat on WhatsAppMessage us directly